| 32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) | Article 38.2 |
| 2. In the case of open procedures, the minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be 52 days from the date on which the contract notice was sent. |
| 32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) | Article 45.2 |
| 2. In the case of open procedures, the minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be 52 days from the date on which the contract notice was sent. |
| 31993L0037 - Works (2nd generation) | Article 12.1 |
Article 12
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders, fixed by the contracting authorities shall be not less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| 31993L0036 - Goods (2nd generation) | Article 10.1 |
Article 10
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders, fixed by the contracting authorities, shall not be less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| 31992L0050 - Services (2nd generation) | Article 18.1 |
Article 18
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be fixed by the contracting authorities at not less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| 31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) | Article 26.1.s1 |
| 1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be fixed by contracting entities at not less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| 31998L0004 - Amendment of Utilities (2nd generation) | Article 1.6=U26.1.1.s1 |
'Article 26
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be fixed by contracting entities at not less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| 31971L0305 - Works (1st generation) | Article 13.1.s1 |
Article 13
In open procedures, the time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be fixed by the authorities awarding contracts at no less than thirty-six days from the date of sending the notice. |
| 31989L0440 - Fourth amendment of Works (1st generation) | Article 1.12=W1-13.1 |
Article 13
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be fixed by the contracting authorities at not less than 52 days from the date of sending the notice. |
| 31977L0062 - Goods (1st generation) | Article 10.1 |
Article 10
1. In open procedure, the time limit for the receipt of tenders fixed by the contracting authorities shall be not less than 36 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| 31980L0767 - First amendment of Goods (1st generation) | Article 6.1 |
Article 6
1. In open procedures, the time limit for the receipt of tenders fixed by the contracting authorities shall be not less than 42 days from the date of dispatch of the notice to the bodies competent to publish such notice. |
| 31988L0295 - Second amendment of Goods (1st generation) | Article 10=G1-10.1 & 19.p5=80/767-6 |
Article 10
Article 10 (1) is replaced by the following:
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders fixed by the contracting authorities shall not be less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice.
Article 19
Articles ..... and 6 of Directive 80/767/EEC are deleted. |
| 31990L0531 - Utilities (1st generation) | Article 20.1.s1 |
Article 20
1. In open procedures the time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be fixed by contracting entities at not less than 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice. |
| Case | Pte | Ref | Text |
N-080327
AV Form | 1-2+K1 | C3-2
C3-38.2 | Ad påstand 1
1. De indklagedes krav om, at tilbudsgivernes varekatalog skulle være dateret senest den 12. november 2007 og dermed »fastfrosset« før udløbet af en frist på mindst 52 dage fra afsendelsen af udbudsbekendtgørelsen, er i strid med udbudsdirektivets artikel 38, stk. 2. Kravet er ligeledes i strid med direktivets artikel 2 og gennemsigtighedsprincippet, fordi tilbudsgiverne ikke på det pågældende tidspunkt vidste, hvilke ydelser der blev stillet krav om, idet oplysning herom først tilgik tilbudsgiverne den 13. november 2007, hvor tilbudslisten blev fremsendt.
2. Påstanden tages til følge.
.....
K1. Ad påstand 1 De indklagede har handlet i strid med Udbudsdirektivets artikel 2 og gennemsigtighedsprincippet samt artikel 38, stk. 2, ved at stille krav om, at tilbudsgiverne senest sammen med tilbuddets indlevering den 3. december 2007 skulle indlevere et varekatalog og en prisliste gældende for tilbuddet, som ikke måtte være dateret senere end den 12. november 2007, idet fristen for afgivelse af tilbud derved ikke reelt blev på mindst 52 dage regnet fra datoen for afsendelsen af udbudsbekendtgørelsen. |
N-080327
AV Form | 3-5+K2 | C3-2.transp
C3-38.2
C3-39.2 | Ad påstand 2
3. Tilbudslisten danner baggrund for tilbudsgivernes – helt legitime – overvejelser over, hvordan tilbudet skal udformes. Det er således ikke uden kendskab til tilbudslisten (»A-sortimentet«) muligt at vide, hvad de indklagede krævede leveret.
4. Den anvendte fremgangsmåde har ikke hjemmel i Udbudsdirektivets artikel 39, stk. 2.
5. Påstanden tages til følge.
.....
K2. Ad påstand 2 De indklagede har handlet i strid med i strid med Udbudsdirektivets artikel 2 og gennemsigtighedsprincippet samt artikel 38, stk. 2, og artikel 39, stk.1, ved først den 13. november 2007 at fremsende det tilbudsskema, som ifølge udbudsbetingelserne skulle anvendes ved afgivelsen af tilbud, idet tilbudsgiverne allerede den 12. november 2007 var bundet til priserne i deres respektive kataloger. |
