NORDIC PROCUREMENT ENFORCEMENT
  LEGAL RESEARCH PROJECT
   

   
 
 
 
    
 
 
Previous
Up
Next
   
   
ECT-2
ECT-5
ECT-10
ECT-12
ECT-28
ECT-30
ECT-43
ECT-45
ECT-46
ECT-49
ECT-50
ECT-55
ECT-81
ECT-82
ECT-86
ECT-87-88
ECT-90
ECT-195
ECT-225
ECT-226
ECT-228 & 233
ECT-229
ECT-230
ECT-232
ECT-234
ECT-238
ECT-240
ECT-242 & 243
ECT-249
ECT-253
ECT-288 & 235
ECT-295
ECT-296

ECT-82

Abuse of dominant position

EU Law Community DK Law EU Cases DK Cases

EU Law

ECT Article 82
1. In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 12 and Articles 81 to 89.
    2. Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.
    3. The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.

EU Cases

Case PteRef Text
    

DK Cases

Case PteRefText
N-990309
Technicomm
1ECT-82 [ex 86]1. Det fremgår af klagerens påstand, at klageren ønsker Klagenævnets stillingtagen til, om DSB har handlet i strid med Forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet ved at tage tilbudet fra Höft und Wessel GmbH af 26. juni 1998 i betragtning, selvom DSB »var klar over, at tilbudet……var afgivet i strid med Rom–Traktatens artikel 86 om misbrug af en dominerende stilling«. Det fremgår af det oplyste, at det hverken af nationale konkurrencemyndigheder eller af myndigheder under EU er fastslået, at Höft und Wessel GmbH har overtrådt artikel 86, og klageren har da også alene til støtte for sin påstand gjort gældende, at »ordregivende myndigheder er forpligtede til at påse, at Rom–Traktatens artikel 86 overholdes«. Efter beskaffenheden af denne begrundelse for påstand 4, f afviser Klagenævnet denne påstand.