NORDIC PROCUREMENT ENFORCEMENT
  LEGAL RESEARCH PROJECT
   

   
 
 
 
    
 
 
Previous
Up
Next
   
   
c3-7.a-b
c3-7.c
c3-8
c3-9.1.1
c3-9.1.2
c3-9.2
c3-9.3
c3-9.4
u3-17.5
c3-9.5.a.1
c3-9.5.a.2
c3-9.5.a.3
c3-9.5.b.1
c3-9.5.b.2
c3-9.5.b.3
u3-17.8
c3-9.6
c3-9.7.1.a
c3-9.7.1.b
c3-9.7.2
c3-9.8.a
c3-9.8.b
c3-9.9
q2-61

32004L0018: c3-9.7.2

Not excluding

EU Law Community DK Law EU Cases DK Cases

EU Law

32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) Article 9.7.2
The choice of method used to calculate the estimated value of a public contract may not be made with the intention of excluding it from the scope of this Directive.
31993L0036 - Goods (2nd generation) Article 5.3.2
The selection of the valuation method shall not be used with the intention of avoiding the application of this Directive.
31988L0295 - Second amendment of Goods (1st generation) Article 6.3.s2=G1-5.3.s2
The selection of the valuation method shall not be used with the intention of avoiding the application of this Article.

EU Cases

Case PteRefText
C-411/00
Swoboda
58-59S2-7.3.p1
S2-7.3.p2
58. Moreover, that conclusion is supported by the wording of Article 7(3) of Directive 92/50, from which it is clear that the choice of the valuation method is not to be made with the intention of avoiding the application of the directive. Although that article relates to a different situation (the artificial splitting up of the contract), the purpose which inspires it (the concern to avoid any risk of manipulation) also precludes a contracting authority from artificially grouping different services in the same contract solely in order to avoid the application in full of the directive to that contract.
    59. In the main case there can be no question, however, of such an artificial grouping in so far as the Bundesvergabeamt has clearly established that the services forming the object of the contract awarded by the ANB, although different in nature, all serve to achieve a single purpose.